Wednesday, October 15, 2014

A few examples of mining software

While the actual process of mining is handled by the mining hardware itself, special software is needed to connect your miners to the blockchain and your mining pool as well, if you are part of a mining pool. The software delivers the work to the miners and receives the completed work from the miners and relays that information back to the blockchain and your mining pool. The software can run on almost any operating system, such as OSX, Windows, Linux, and has even been ported to work on a Raspberry Pi with some modifications for drivers depending on your mining setup.
Not only does the software relay the input and output of your miners to the blockchain, but it also monitors them and displays general statistics such as the temperature, hashrate, fan speed, and average speed of the miner.

There are a few different types of mining software out there and each have their own advantages and disadvantages, so be sure to read up on the various mining software out there.

cgminer_4.2.2_windows.rar

miner 50 web sofware pool btc

bfgminer_4.7.0_win64_1_.zip to bct vga miner all pool miner

 

State of Bitcoin Q3 2014: Ecosystem Maturing Amid Price Pressure

We are pleased to release our latest quarterly State of Bitcoin update.
This article will run through some key findings from the new report, which focuses on data and events in the third quarter of 2014 up to the present day. 
Overall, this quarter could be characterized as a ‘Tale of Two Bitcoins’. 
On the one hand, significant bitcoin venture investment continued and much progress was made in furthering adoption, particularly in bitcoin’s use as a medium of exchange.
On the other, there was a steady erosion in the price of bitcoin throughout the quarter (Slide 10), which was further punctuated by a sharp plunge of roughly 20% at the start of Q4.

SOB 1
Slide 10: Significant Events and Price Response in Q3 2014

Price still a focus

Last quarter we noted how some noteworthy bitcoin observers felt that there has been too much emphasis placed on bitcoin’s price. However, out of the 10 most read stores on CoinDesk during the second quarter, four were about bitcoin’s price.
In the third quarter this interest has only increased, as almost twice as many of the top 10 CoinDesk stories were focused on bitcoin’s price (Slide 20).

SOB 2
Slide 20: Top-10 Most Read CoinDesk Stories in Q3 2014

Given how the fourth quarter has begun we do not expect interest in bitcoin’s price to abate any time soon.

Q2 price gains lost in Q3

In the media business it is often said that bad news sells more than good, so perhaps the fact that bitcoin’s price fell nearly 40% in Q3 helps explain the greater relative interest in price in the most recent quarter. 
The third quarter also featured a remarkable price coincidence: after rising 39.4% in Q2, bitcoin’s price fell by a nearly identical amount in Q3 (Slide 9). 

SOB 3
Slide 9: Comparison of Bitcoin’s Price Moves in Q2 and Q3

A wide range of theories have been put forth to explain bitcoin’s price decline, ranging from macroeconomic factors (such as a strong US dollar) and regulatory concerns (like the BitLicense), to a lack of speculative investment momentum (Slide 15).

SOB 4
Slide 15: Significant Bitcoin Events and Price Response in Q2

One of the more widely debated and somewhat counterintuitive theories proposed by Citi and others on why bitcoin’s price saw a steady decline throughout Q3 is increasing merchant adoption.
This theory goes as follows: growing merchant acceptance by companies like Dell is creating selling pressure as these companies quickly liquidate bitcoins they accept for national currencies. 
However, right now there are arguably too few merchant transactions to have a significant influence on price (for example Overstock is only averaging $15k per day in bitcoin sales) while a single bitcoin exchange like Bitstamp can do upwards of several millions of dollars in bitcoin trading volume each day.
Additionally, while it’s true that in the short-term timing differences may lead to commerce supply-demand imbalances, over the medium-term bitcoin-to-fiat conversions by payment processors should be balanced by fiat-to-bitcoin conversions by bitcoin-spending consumers (Slide 13).

SOB 5
Slide 13: The Virtuous Bitcoin Commerce Cycle

All-time bitcoin startup VC investment crosses $300 million

While Q3 did not match the second quarter’s $73m in venture investment, the third quarter saw a substantial $60m of new venture capital invested in bitcoin startups.
To date, including early Q4 deals such as Blockchain’s $30.5 million round a total of $317m has now been invested in bitcoin startups since 2012; 71% of this figure ($224m) has come in 2014 alone (Slide 27).

sob 6
Slide 27: Bitcoin Venture Capital Investment Summary

2014 VC investment to exceed 1995 Internet

One of the more widely discussed elements of earlier State of Bitcoin reports has been our comparison of the level of investment in early Internet startups versus investment in early bitcoin startups. 
VCs such as Marc Andreessen have compared bitcoin’s overall potential, as well as its current stage of development, to the Internet circa 1993.
Our comparison was meant to assess whether VCs are backing up their lofty bitcoin statements with their wallets. And notwithstanding a number of methodological issues which we discussed previously with making this comparison (including inflation and changes over time in the cost of launching a startup), we feel the comparison is still interesting and useful.
We are currently projecting a total of $290m to be invested in bitcoin startups for the calendar year of 2014. This figure would well exceed the $250m invested in first sequence Internet startups in 1995 (Slide 32).

SOB 7
Slide 32: Bitcoin vs early Internet VC investment ($s millions)

*Note: Only includes first sequence venture deals; late-stage 1995 Internet investments totaling $257.6m are excluded.
Sources: PricewaterhouseCoopers, National Venture Capital Association, CoinDesk, Dow Jones VentureSource, VentureScanner.
The 2014 run rate for publicly-disclosed VC investment in bitcoin startups would also equal nearly three times more than the total investment VCs made in bitcoin startups in 2013. 
In short, a ‘wall of money’ continues flowing towards bitcoin startups. This massive investment made by venture capitalists is shaping up to be one of the most important bitcoin stories for 2014.

More commerce and consumer traction

Bitcoin has seen much faster adoption as an alternative store of value, or object of speculation, than as a medium of exchange.
In the third quarter Dell became the largest retailer by far to begin accepting bitcoin for payment for anything on the Dell.com site (Slide 44).

sob 8
Slide 44: Largest Bitcoin Accepting Retailers

Companies like Dell and Purse.io also are giving consumers compelling reasons to actually spend bitcoins by offering savings off full retail price of anywhere between 10-30%. 
While we have shaved our end of year forecast slightly we are continuing to see strong growth in the number of merchants accepting bitcoin (Slide 42). 

sob 9
Slide 42: Bitcoin Accepting Merchants – Total Current and Forecasted 2014 Year End

There were 1.2 million new bitcoin wallets created in Q3, representing 21% growth quarter-over-quarter. We continue to forecast 8 million total bitcoin wallets by the end of 2014 (Slide 47).

sob 10
Slide 47: Bitcoin Wallets – Total Current and Forecasted 2014 Year End

We hope you enjoy the State of Bitcoin Q3 2014 report. We thank you, our readers, for making CoinDesk the world’s leading source of bitcoin news, analysis and perspective, and we very much welcome your feedback and ideas on how we can make the State of Bitcoin even better.
Sincerely,

Bitcoin Miners Debate Risks and Rewards at Las Vegas Convention




Tuscany Exterior

This week, the first-ever conference aimed at bitcoin miners, mining companies and those with an interest in the sector kicked off amid the glitz and glamour of downtown Las Vegas.
Hasher’s United, hosted this year at The Tuscany Hotel and Casino from 9th to 11th October, included panels focused on a number of practical and conceptual topics and brought together speakers like venture capitalist Tim Draper, GAWMiners CEO Josh Garza and BitAngels co-founder and chairman Michael Terpin. A number of companies in the space including China-based manufacturer Bitmain, cooling technology specialist Green Revolution Cooling and more were also in attendance.
Many in the 100-strong crowd were small- or medium-sized bitcoin and altcoin miners, most of whom have been mining for at least the past year-and-a-half. As some told CoinDesk, the event provided an avenue for miners to both interface with companies in the space and learn new ideas to apply to their existing strategies.

Opening talk on crypto’s future

The first panel, which included Draper, Garza and Terpin, cast a wide net by asking a simple question: where is crypto headed today?
Though focused primarily on the technological advancements made possible using digital currency, the panel members – as well as many others on the first day of the event – found their way back to one of the industry’s hottest topics: the price of bitcoin.
Draper noted that he may have been “too conservative” about his prediction of $10,000 per bitcoin in three years. He remarked that miners who exchange their bitcoins for fiat currencies are a significant part of the selling pressure we’re seeing on the markets today.
Draper explained that this dynamic should reverse in the future, saying:
“[Miners are] a force-selling component and nobody’s buying. But as these companies evolve and all of these businesses allow us to use bitcoin for more and more purposes, that will be what drives the price up.”
Terpin polled the crowd by asking how many sell a certain percentage of their bitcoins for fiat currencies like the dollar. One only miner raised their hand when Terpin asked if they sold 100% of their bitcoin for dollars, and about one-third of the crowd indicated that they don’t sell any of their generated bitcoins.
Garza voiced the least concern regarding the price, saying that ultimately, the value of bitcoin is underpinned not so much by the consumers and merchants who use and accept digital currency but by the miners who facilitate the whole network.
“Miners believe in the currency the most,” he said.
Garza later drew applause when he said that GAWMiners pushes strongly for acceptance within its business-to-business dealings, saying that his company has told others that “if you won’t accept our bitcoins we won’t do business with you.”
Panel 1
The panel also discussed how the future of digital currency usage will see a rapid increase in the development and deployment of smart contracts. Draper said that he is currently exploring options for use in his venture capital dealings, adding that the legal and accounting professions risk being upended by smart contracts or programmable transactions.
Terpin argued during the panel that, as far as the US is concerned, the move toward digital currency adoption won’t be as smooth as Draper was predicting. The problem, he said, was that American bitcoin users haven’t been presented with a viable use case for the technology.
“I don’t think there’s a killer app in the US beyond investing if you have a bank account,” Terpin concluded.
The panel also spoke briefly on the topic of the underbanked and bitcoin in emerging markets. All three participants touched on the potential of bitcoin-powered remittances, but acknowledged how the infrastructure isn’t quite yet in place for emerging market use of bitcoin to take off.
“The question is: how do you get bitcoin to all these people?” Draper asked.

Industry dives deep

Following the broad opening panel, the first day of Hasher’s United featured a plethora of talks and discussions on some of the issues facing miners today, potential revenue sources and strategies for maximizing efficiency and profits.
There were also a series of presentations made by companies in the space, including one by Genesis Mining which saw the unveiling of Project X, a new product that enables cross-coin mining without the need to purchase separate contracts. Several altcoin developers, including litecoin creator Charlie Lee and the teams behind ultracoin and unbreakablecoin also held demos and exhibitions during the event.
Panel3
Lifeboat Foundation advisor and CoinDesk contributor Hass McCook led a talk on the business foundations of bitcoin, breaking the digital currency mining and services sectors down to their basic structural elements. He argued that some miners do themselves a disservice by not adopting more formal business practices, a problem that, in some ways, holds back the broader industry.
He explained that the market fundamentals remain solid, providing a unique opportunity for miners to create value-added services based on the creative demands of their customer base.
McCook added:
“There are so many things that bitcoin can do for us, we don’t know 90% of what it can do for us yet. These [use cases] will come out as smart people continue developing products.”
Predicting that “95% of bitcoin startups will fail,” McCook offered his vision for the future crypto-economy. He predicted that, owing to the homogenous nature of bitcoin hardware and the general trends we’re seeing in the industry today, the digital currency market ten years from now will be characterized by greater consolidation, the creation of so-called “super-services” and the proliferation of block chain technology in a number of key industries.
Panel2

He acknowledged that the process won’t be simple, and that further price discovery will likely occur. On the other hand, McCook said that events such as the notorious ‘bearwhale‘ may become less frequent as usage ignites and major players hold less bitcoins overall.

Mining’s behavioral challenges

One of the more notable panels of the day centered on the topic of game theory and the question of how this area of research can be applied to bitcoin mining and the wide-ranging security vulnerabilities facing the sector today.
The talk included insights from Cornell University researcher Emin Gun Sirer, Princeton University assistant professor Arvind Narayanan, University of Maryland PhD candidate Andrew Miller and Sean Bowe, creator of model development platform SimBit.
Miller, who shared his research on the types of attacks centered on bitcoin mining pools, including so-called vigilante attacks that essentially sabotage the act of collective mining.
He offered a series of potential changes to the reward structure, including changing the dynamic nature of block rewards to encourage less malevolence. At the same time, Miller suggested that the consensus-base nature of bitcoin development and the technology’s history could prevent otherwise worthwhile fixes from being integrated:
“Any time there will be a consideration in the future of a possible change, there will be some kind of complicated tug-of-war over the tradeoffs and the prior investments that might be affected by it.”
Sirer, co-author of a controversial paper on a mining network vulnerability known as selfish mining, opined that the mining sector itself isn’t the simplest ecosystem to map out and analyse from theoretical and behavioral perspectives.
“It’s difficult to model what miners want,” he offered.
Narayanan argued that game theorists who work in the bitcoin space need to do a better job of interfacing with other parts of the ecosystem in order to obtain more reliable data.
He said:
“What I think is that the theorists and academics working on bitcoin need to work out to the community, the miners, and have a firm grasp of some of these strategies’ implications in order to input into the game theory models.”
Sirer disputed this, offering examples of how his team reached out to both community members and the bitcoin core development team. Bluntly acknowledging the “pushback” he experienced following the release of the selfish mining paper, Sirer thanked the core team for being open to the eventual development of a fix to the vulnerability.
During a question-and-answer session after the panel, one miner asked about the risk of 51% attacks on the network given the rise of large mining pools in the past. The participants stated that, ultimately, there is little to do in a distributed system like bitcoin mining beyond community outreach to keep mining conglomerates honest.

Why European Retailer Showroomprive Decided to Embrace Bitcoin














showroomprive bitcoin


Showroomprive is a Paris-based online shopping website for clothes, cosmetics and household items that offers discounts of 30–70% off of leading brand-name products.
The firm’s more than $500m in annual revenue make it one of the leading e-commerce companies in Europe, with figures from 2013 placing it just behind LVMH Moët Hennessy, and the second largest private sales website behind Vente-privee.
These figures could increase, the company hopes, now that it has integrated bitcoin into its payment options.
In an interview with CoinDesk, cofounder and chief executive Thierry Petit said:
“I plan that probably between 5 and 10% of my payments in the next three or four years in Europe will be through the bitcoin system. If there is some additional technology and if some of the big players accept bitcoin then it will accelerate and change the game.”
Showroomprive has an active mobile app platform through which it currently generates more than 50% of its fashion-driven sales. However, at present, it does not accept bitcoin on its apps.

Looking to US leaders

Petit’s business targets consumers that are looking to buy leading brand-name products at the most affordable prices, so being able to offer his customers an additional payment option seemed like “something very disruptive and interesting”.
“For me as founder of the company – I’m an engineer to be honest and I love technology and seeing how it can disrupt our industry,” he said.
Bitcoin first piqued Petit’s curiosity about a year and a half ago, he said, and this year the major US corporations that began integrating it as a customer payments option turned him on a little bit more.
Petit said:
“A few months ago, we noticed that various tests had already been carried out in the United States, for example. More and more well-known e-commerce sites, like Dell or Expedia, have already integrated bitcoin as part of their services. That’s why we were very conscious that it may be a real innovation for our payment strategy. […] That’s why I wanted to be very pragmatic, to cut to the solution.”
Showroomprive first implemented bitcoin payments into its operations in the Netherlands because the market was primed for payments innovation.
“As for France,” he added, “we are adopting a practical approach, but we believe that consumer tendencies are evolving. The two are compatible.”

A change of heart

Petit said the learning process has been surprising for him, and that the doom and doubt communicated about bitcoin by so much of the media and financial industries made him wary of the concept – at first.
He said:
“The fact that people are now motivated by bitcoin, they know more or less what it is – this is a really positive point. I was a little bit afraid by bad comments in the ecosystem and it’s on the contrary, a lot of people think it’s a great innovation.”
He then turned to the regulatory sphere, where he spoke highly of French senator Philippe Marini and defended his approach to regulating bitcoin activity.
“In France that they want to [regulate] for something positive, and not to kill bitcoin,” he said.

A collaborative economy

Petit spoke to bitcoin’s practical uses and advantages to his business, citing perks like instant transactions and lower transaction fees.
He added that he’s observed a lot of new digital wallet companies and other technology platforms enter into the payments, banking and e-commerce space, and surmised that the growing trend might be the result of an increasingly mobile way of life.
He said:
“One thing that is not disrupted yet is the money. Bitcoin can disrupt the money through several actions – it can give the company immediate transfer, lower commission [...] it’s very interesting in terms of construction and as you can see, a lot of developments, like Airbnb, are coming to this collaborative economy.”
He added: “The payments industry at this time in Europe is like a war [...] maybe bitcoin will have something to play in this industry.”

Why Apple Pay Is a Threat to Bitcoin

Apple Pay isn’t even here yet and, arguably, it’s already winning the war against bitcoin.
Like the digital currency, Apple is disrupting the payments system, but people will probably use it more than they use bitcoin.
Cupertino has carefully focused on three areas to make sure that happens: front-end experience, financial institutions, and merchants.
So what is the cryptocurrency community going to do about it?

Apple Pay’s holy trinity

Apple nailed the customer experience side. For starters, it rolled out the system with the new iPhone, and with the announcement of the Apple Watch, both of which garnered unprecedented attention from the tech industry.
It sold 10 million iPhone 6 models in the first weekend. The watch is going to sell in droves. Not all of these customers will use Apple Pay, of course. But many will. And far fewer people own bitcoin.
Then, there are the merchants. Apple snagged deals with major brands before Apple Pay was even announced. Retailers including Whole Foods, Bloomingdales, Staples, Walgreens and Subway are already signed up.
NFC POS system with phoneThe firm has also timed the system’s launch expertly: point-of-sale (POS) systems need Near Field Communication (NFC) capability to work, and POS systems that support these can be expensive.
However, many retailers will be mulling upgrades to their existing POS terminals anyway, thanks to a critical deadline next October, when US retailers will be required to use the chip-and-pin technology already available in major credit cards, as an added security measure.
If they don’t, then they could be liable for card fraud, rather than the card providers, who shoulder the responsibility today. If they are upgrading their POS systems anyway, NFC will seem like an easier decision.
On the financial side, Apple has secured Visa, MasterCard, and Amex, along with several major US banks.
Users will be drawn to the better security within Apple Pay, which prevents credit card details from having to travel through merchant networks. Apple Pay uses a token instead, to represent the card, along with a one-time dynamic number designed to help authenticate transactions securely.

Thumbs up for security

Then, of course, there’s the iTouch biometric system, which will be used to authenticate the user. iTouch may have its detractors, but is a lot better than the current paper signature system in the US (which retail clerks won’t necessarily even check), and will likely be better than PIN verification too, which as security guru Brian Krebs points out are easily skimmable.
Apple Pay may help to prevent credit card security breaches such as the Home Depot and Target thefts, which haunt the headlines on a worryingly frequent basis.
With conventional swipe-and-sign credit card systems as used across the US today, the card vendor is responsible for the data on the card’s magstripe. With Apple Pay, the merchant POS systems needn’t see the credit card at all.

New tricks, same old dog

All of this will be sweet music to banks, merchants and retail customers alike. It’s like nails on a chalkboard for the bitcoin community.
For starters, as some have already said, Apple’s partnership with the banks and payment processors still puts the incumbent system firmly in control. The only thing that really changes is the payment channel.
Apple Pay is therefore still anathema to bitcoin’s mission, which involves disrupting centralized control in the financial industry and returning real financial control to the user.
If the bitcoin industry really wants to take on Apple Pay, it has to reinvent itself.
Second, Apple is beating bitcoin in terms of the customer experience. Its ecosystem is exceedingly user friendly and customer focused.
The company has spent years perfecting a design and user experience language that is second to none in the tech business, and, whenever it turns its attention to an existing business model, it brings these tools to bear, recrafting entire industries in its own image.
People understand Apple phones, and thanks to Jony Ive’s team, they will quickly understand the Apple Watch. Moreover, they will crave these devices.
Bitcoin, on the other hand, is still striving for mainstream adoption. Notwithstanding positive news from the likes of PayPal, Circle, and Stripe, the concept is still opaque to many. The market for wallets is fragmented, and scandals like Mt Gox still scare many away.
By its very nature, bitcoin is a grassroots movement. It doesn’t enjoy the same top-down organisation that Apple does. That means that design, user experience, and security are inconsistent across its many implementations. That makes it hard for mainstream users to understand.

A craving for control

iPad with Steve JobsApple’s ability to control every detail of the user experience is also the source of one of its biggest threats: it is an inherently fascistic company. A penchant for total control is a dangerous thing in a company that likes to reinvent entire industries.
Ever since the early 2000s, if not before, Apple has thrived on locking people into its ecosystem, and it excels at cementing this structure up and down the supply chain. We saw this with the launch of the iTunes store, which Apple integrated with the iPod and iTunes products upon its launch in 2003, signing deals with the major labels.
Jobs admitted this fact not long before his death, explaining in an internal 2010 email that he wanted to “explicitly lock customers in Apple’s ecosystem”.
Apple has used its hardware and software innovations to strongarm companies – and customers – into deals. In 2010, shortly after the launch of the iPad, it made magazine and newspaper publishers wanting to sell subscriptions via iPad apps subscribe to an agency model, in which it kept all of their subscriber and credit card information. Even Rupert Murdoch had to capitulate.
Apple also agreed to pay $450m to settle a civil action lawsuit, after it was shown to have engineered retail prices on ebooks in collaboration with several top publishers, using the power of the iPad.
Since its App Store emerged, Apple has been infamous for the strong and often ambiguous control that it exerts over its ecosystem.
Although its policy on virtual currencies changed in June, leading to the launch of several bitcoin wallet apps for iOS, the fact remains that the fortunes of App Store vendors – including those offering bitcoin wallets – are entirely subject to Apple’s whim.

The struggle ahead

So, Apple Pay will probably succeed, as customers flock to it, unaware of the control that they are giving up, and of the benefits that bitcoin could offer. History has shown repeatedly that the majority will trade control for convenience. If you have any doubts, just look at Facebook.
There are positive upsides, perhaps, if you squint. Yes, perhaps Apple Pay will drive NFC into the ecosystem so that bitcoin can use it. But then, by the time that happens, Apple Pay will already be there.
Apple Pay won’t obliterate bitcoin, of course, but it is going to shine very bright as a payment channel. It will attract large numbers of users with the convenience of instant mobile payments just as bitcoin faces its next major challenge: to move from being a largely speculative asset into a true currency, used every day by millions of users around the world.
Bitcoin needs to continue that transition, to introduce more liquidity into the market and to meet its real potential.
So if the bitcoin industry really wants to take on Apple Pay, it has to reinvent itself. Make itself friendly. Market itself to people so technologically ignorant that they’re one step away from microwaving their iPhones. That’s a difficult task to pull off.

How Bitcoin’s Block Chain Could Stop History Being Rewritten


 Bitcoin and Revolutionary Journalism


Despite the recent drop in bitcoin’s price, cryptocurrency startups are now attracting more investment than ever and stories about major developments in the bitcoin ecosystem are being picked up by mainstream media on a regular basis.
The New York Times reported the news that popular bitcoin wallet provider Blockchain had raised $30.5m in financing. Last week, Time published an article titled How Bitcoin Can Save Journalism and the Arts, exploring bitcoin’s micropayment capability for creating a new model of content distribution that is free from advertising.
Yet, long before this new interest and innovation sparked outside the tech community, WikiLeaks editor-in-chief Julian Assange was seeing the promise of the bitcoin technology beyond currency.
The confluence of this stateless digital currency and the iconic whistle-blowing site first emerged when WikiLeaks faced a financial blockade by Bank of America, Visa, MasterCard, PayPal and Western Union, which reportedly blocked 95% of their revenue.
Bitcoin was used to circumvent the banking blockade. Here the advocates for the free flow of decentralized currency joined the fight for free speech.

The WikiLeaks-bitcoin alliance

In his conversation with Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt documented in his new book When Google Met WikiLeaks, Assange described bitcoin as “something that evolved out of the cypherpunks” and explained in detail the underpinning technology that made it possible for WikiLeaks to counteract the state’s economic censorship.
However, it seems this is just the tip of the iceberg of the WikiLeaks-bitcoin alliance and the revolutionary potential hidden within the encryption-based network. The ramifications of bitcoin technology go far beyond the economic domain.
Appearing in the form of a hologram at The Nantucket Project conference, Assange spoke of the significance of the block chain, the underlying technology of bitcoin, particularly in relation to journalism and holding those in power to account.
Assange addressed the use of the block chain to create an historical archive. Calling bitcoin “the most interesting intellectual development on the Internet in the last five years”, he described how the underlying architecture can be used for “providing proof of publishing at a certain time”.
See a video of Assange’s comments below:
The block chain’s premise seemed to unite with WikiLeaks’ mission. In April 2010, Assange took the stage at the Oslo Freedom Forum, where he warned of the enormous force of control and power within the Internet and increasing censorship that threatens the free flow of information.
He spoke of the vital role of human intellectual content in civilization and described how, in this age of technology, everything is moving to digital. This power, often accrued by an unelected few, has increased through control of digital storage and access to information. This makes possible the erasing or altering of information that is critical to the historical record. He pointed out:
“We are now approaching the state of Orwell’s dictum, perfect dictum, that ‘he who controls the present controls the past’. He who controls the Internet servers controls the intellectual record of mankind, and by controlling that, controls our perception of who we are, and by controlling that, controls what laws and regulations we make in society.”

Preserving history

Dismantling this force of control has been WikiLeaks’ mission. By employing its method of transparency in the form of ‘scientific journalism’, they aimed to open governments and reveal their actions behind closed doors.
Through liberating the flow of information that had been stagnated by secrecy, complexity and manipulation, the organization strove to break Orwell’s dictum and bring the power to shape history into the hands of ordinary people.
Four years later, WikiLeaks is still on the front lines of this battle. In his new book, Assange again addressed the escalating implementation of Orwell’s dictum.
Giving an example of an incident where the Guardian pulled six articles from 2003 without explanation, he emphasized how WikiLeaks’ primary focus was to preserve “politically salient intellectual content while it is under attack” by going after information that has been suppressed or deleted.

Doing away with trust

Assange found a solution in the evolving block-chain technology. This provides decentralized solutions to the problems of centralized time stamping, as this requires trust in central authority, making it susceptible to third-party alteration and intervention.
Bitcoin’s distributed trust network can offer immunity from central control of any historical record. Assange described the basic premise of this technology as a network of consensus where “you can prove a particular statement, particular consensus and particular contract that happened at a particular time globally and it requires the subversion of every single jurisdiction where people are running bitcoin to overturn that”.
The invention of the block chain further empowers people and challenges the insidious culture of ownership and control.
In a nutshell, he noted: “bitcoin’s underlying technology breaks Orwell’s dictum”.
Some people have already used the block chain to store more than just transactions. In his blog, Ken Shirriff documented the result of his search through the block-chain ‘database’, reporting his discovery of interesting things including Satoshi Nakamoto’s white-paper, an image of Nelson Mandela and a 2.5-megabyte WikiLeaks cablegate backup. This information is now securely documented and cannot be erased or modified by anyone.
Proof of Existence is an example of the application of decentralized proof. This online service provides a way for people to publicly prove the existence of documents without revealing the data or their identity through bitcoin’s decentralized trust network.
It is a continuation of the earlier waves of decentralization of information seen in the last decade with the rise of Wikipedia, through its open-source collaborative production of a historical record – an online decentralized encyclopedia.

Freedom from control

Just as the Internet brought the everyday person the power to create their own narratives, the invention of the block chain further empowers people and challenges the insidious culture of ownership and control.
With unprecedented currency crises and government corruption, people are increasingly looking for alternatives to state and corporate control. As more begin to move into bitcoin to avoid government debasement, it isn’t far-fetched to imagine how this stateless public asset ledger could also become a new safe haven for investigative journalism and whistle-blowers.
A lot has happened since that day in Oslo when Assange identified the conundrum of our age. As the battle to break Orwell’s dictum intensifies, we now have in our hands a great tool to open up society.
Bitcoin can not only be used to fund revolutionary journalism like WikiLeaks, but also offers a decentralized platform for anyone to directly combat state censorship of information and create transparency for those in power.
The invention of bitcoin is just one crest of the continuous waves of a cryptographic revolution. As Assange said, this could free us from Orwell’s dictum.
In a time of seemingly universal deceit, reclaiming our past on the block chain is quickly becoming a revolutionary act.

IMF and World Bank Panel: Bitcoin Block Chain Could Boost Financial Inclusion

 imf world bank meetings



This weekend private and public sector delegates convened for a panel discussion about technology’s role in achieving greater global financial inclusion as part of a four-part seminar series at the Annual Meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank Group in Washington, DC.
The panelists included Standard Chartered Bank group chief executive Peter Sands; Colombian Minister of Finance and Public Credit Mauricio Cárdenas; Visa global head of strategic partnerships Bill Gajda; JPMorgan Chase global chair of technology, media and telecom and investment banking Jennifer Nason; and professor of economics at Yale University Dean Karlan. Vice chairman of the US Federal Reserve board Stanley Fischer moderated the discussion.
At the outset, Sands spoke generally about the need for business model reforms to allow the operational and commercial impact of technology’s promise in the financial services industry.
“What we haven’t seen is this kind of sweeping, total transformation of the business model that you’ve seen in industries like music or publishing – and the reason I talk about those is that they’re digital industries and there is nothing about banking that is inherently physical,” he said, adding:
“Even notes and coins are essentially tokens and property rights; they don’t have to be physical.”
Sands was also the one that later introduced the matter of “cyber currencies – bitcoin and so on” and the only delegate to voice his position on them. He said he is unconvinced that they will be more than a niche application, but called the underpinning block chain technology “a true computational innovation that could be very powerful in the context of financial inclusion”.

Interoperability issues

Gajda echoed Sands’ sentiments about the business model, saying there is a lot of work required to address things like transaction costs for micropayments and issues of interoperability.
While the delegates from the banking and payments industries gave favorable responses to the wave of new technology and innovation so ingrained now in financial services, he said that interoperability will be key in driving the next level of scale. To get there, Gajda concluded, would require some business model innovation from everyone.
The Visa executive didn’t speak about digital currencies specifically, though one could apply many of his points on how to use technology to help financial services grow and move towards alleviating global poverty to bitcoin itself.
Gajda noted:
“I’m actually very confident about the rate in which technology will advance in these markets and the way it’ll be used to provide scalable and secure payments. The challenge as I see it really isn’t a technical barrier. I think there are some business model barriers and I think a lot of it has to do with consumer education.”

Transforming titled property

There is a counterpart to the financial aspect of financial inclusion: fundamental property rights.
Sands appeared enthusiastic about the potential of bitcoin technology and its potential to reform titled property, which he called “the most bureaucratic, inefficient mechanism there is” in Western countries as well as the developing world.
He explained:
“You could transfer title to the thing youre buying … If you’re buying a car or a house, your transfer of title using this kind of distributed ledger-type technology could be massively more efficient than the system at the moment.”
If people are going to become economic actors, he added, they must be enabled to establish and transfer property rights, especially as they acquire entrepreneurial tools and skills and eventually become small business owners.
“That’s where I think actually some of these block chain technologies could be really powerful,” Sands concluded.

Infrastructure is key

Cárdenas focused more on the currency aspect of digital currencies, maintaining a critical attitude toward the technology during his remarks.
When discussing inclusion, he put particular importance on the need for a money transfer system in which the sender isn’t required to pay up to 10% in related transaction fees.
“We need to make sure that people who are using those services that are so overpriced have access to technologies where they can take advantage of these efficiencies,” he said. “And that means using less cash.”
However, he added that when he thinks of bitcoin, he also thinks about the value of controlling money “in the broad sense”, placing a lot of weight on policy as a means of stabilizing any economy, generating the conditions for growth and low inflaton, and doing so “under the traditional payments system”.
To this, Fischer responded:
“There’s a very interesting line of research as to whether you actually need the physical money to be there in order to control the price of it or whether you can do it with just the interest rate so it’s clear that as long as there’s an epsilon of money you can control the price or interest rate and then the questions what’s the limit of that process which nobody knows at the moment.”